Moscow's secret weapon: Ariel Sharon and the Israeli Mafia
March 1, 1986 Executive Intelligence Review: Steinberg & Goldman
Prologue: If someone tells you that you can get to the bottom of the JFK Assassination not having full acquaintance with the links between the Soviet Union & Israel, take it to the bank - they are lying to you. Does that mean I’m proposing Russians and/or Zionists pulled the trigger on Jack? No, of course not…. that not how things work.
The problem here is… when we are eventually ready to get to the JFK hit itself… unless the dialectical deceptions - which have worked so well over time to keep the vast majority of people unable/unwilling to see the elephant in the room - are disabled one at a time, nothing about the simple truths we bring to bear will ‘make sense’ to folks. It’ll be - hey! You’ve got ‘nazis’ & jews working the same conspiracy! How the hell can THAT be, eh? Well, that’s actually what we’re doin here…. showin ya HOW that indeed can be!
For the longest time, I resisted the imputations regularly made by the Larouchists as to the neo-colonial nature of the British relationship with the USA. The longstanding criminal intent displayed by the Empire against it’s former colony was not so clear in my eyes as it was in theirs. It was only when I became fully aware of the manner in which the UK itself would gradually become a “colony” itself… of a hard to nail down group of shadowy plotters with hard to discern agendas…
that I could begin to reconcile their viewpoint with my own. As I’ve already mentioned in the one of the opening posts here, the phenomena of “Anglo-zionism is the key concept to grasp when seeking to understand the transatlantic relationship and it’s ‘love/hate’ dynamics.
While discussion of the Russian Revolution’s plotters may seem wholly extraneous to the issue of ‘Who Killed Kennedy,” patient study of the data proves it is not so all. Even as you will read below - the names of our MAIN PROTAGONISTS the Bronfman Gang mixed into the proceedings - it’s important to grasp that plotters themselves were but agents of those who had trained and sent them into Russia. And where were they trained - and financed from?
Why, Merry Olde, of course! So you see, we have a deep mystery to detain us long before we can even leave the starting gate at Dealey Plaza!
The supposed antithesis of Wall St & City of London bankers (and their political puppets)… and the rough n scruffy ‘communist’ revolutionaries who made noises about wanting to ‘overthrow’ capitalism in favor of a ‘dictatorship of the working class’ was simply a ‘marketing gambit?’
Sorry to break it to ya! Yup, that’s pretty much all it ever was! History of our world being a gigantic FABRICATION FACTORY. And with the arrival of the pack of fake ‘religious refugees’ from the Soviet Union in the seventies and eighties, that factory started working OVERTIME. The Soviet crime family alumni released from their Gulag HQ to feed on the rich pastures of a complacent west weren’t long in seizing the levers of communication - even before the Zucks & Brin gang were awarded their Facebook and Google franchises. The business of ‘controlling the narrative’ became - to rephrase Wilson’s “the business of the USA is business” …. the business of the new “Red USA!”
Now that we have that preliminary ‘phony contradiction’ of the dialectical imperium out of the way… we can move on to disposing of others - like -let’s say, “fascism’ vs ‘communism’ … that’s a good one! “Left vs Right” - all the ‘sacred cows’ of fake historiography are on their way ‘out the window’ starting right now…. oh ya!
EXTRA EXTRA! You can “read all about it”… here.
Bitterly, former Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion referred to
Mussolini admirer Vladimir Jabotinsky, as "Vladimir Hitler." In the pro
cess leading to the establishment of the state of Israel, the faction of the
Irgun ("The Organization"), linked to Mussolini-admirer Jabotinsky, was
something which most Jews, worldwide, denounced in fearful whispers.
The hard-core of the Irgun were fascists by profession, politically allied
with Mussolini, strongly objecting to Adolf Hitler's anti-Semitism, but
not Hitler's other fascist crimes. At the core, they were also gangsters,
partly recruited from the circles of organized crime, and notorious for
gangsters' methods of settling political differences with Irgun critics.
AC
The two arrested Israeli spies, Jonathan Pollard, and his wife, Anne
(née Henderson) Pollard, are merely third-level figures in a ring working
under the sponsorship of Israeli bully-boy Ariel Sharon, and the direction
of Sharon's "wet-works" specialist, Rafael "Dirty Rafi" Eytan. The ring
reaches high into the ranks of the Executive Branch of the U.S. gov
ernment, into the Congress, and extends its wicked influence into the
federal courts. This is not merely an Israeli spy-ring; it is a spy-ring
operating under the Israeli flag, but controlled by a network of Soviet
agents, centered around the notorious Armand Hammer and the Bronf
man family interests. Behind the ring, is the second generation of the
Irgun apparatus of the late 1940s. The two Pollards are merely the prov
erbial tip of the iceberg.
Ariel Sharon
The extensive history of Israeli spying against the United States, is
reported by the CIA's Bill Eveland, in an article in the recent issue of
Middle East International. On Jan. 15, 1986, a top-level British source
commented: "In return for the U.S.S.R.'s release of Soviet Jews, the
Israelis have passed on material to the U.S.S.R. as a quid pro quo. This
has been going on for decades." In discussion with EIR, top-ranking
British Sovietologist, Edinburgh-based John Erickson, commented on
the Pollard affair: "The Soviet Union and Israel are much closer than
most people think. The Soviets very much want to get back into
the Israeli picture. They want a presence there, and the Russians are
now pushing this relationship as far as they can."
In the context of the policies of the current party chief Mikhail Gor
bachov and his regime, he estimated, it were increasingly possible that
the Mossad could serve as a clearinghouse for the Soviet intelligence
services.
Highly placed sources in Israel, date Ariel Sharon's negotiations with
Moscow to approximately 1978. The best corroborated evidence cur
rently, is that Sharon became a Soviet asset about 1981, about the same
time that long-standing Israeli intelligence agent Jonathan Pollard joined
the Sharon-controlled spy ring to conduct the activities for which he
was arrested recently.
When discussing this problem, most intelligence experts point to Shar
on's surreptitious trips into the Soviet bloc. Although EIR has cross
checked and corroborated some of these recent visits, we did not have
spies on the scene to overhear what passed between Sharon and Soviet
officials. EIR relies on what it does know with certainty, the Armand
Hammer connection, and the close connections of Sharon to Edgar
Bronfman and the Meyer Lansky mob generally, as well as Henry A.
Kissinger's deep personal connections to both Sharon and Sharon's dirtiest
dealings inside Israel itself. EIR has eyewitness documentation, never
before published until now, which exposes the character of Sharon and
his Irgun allies.
The Soviet connection
Shortly after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, Bolshevik leader Leon
Trotsky worked with a group of Polish Bolsheviks, to set up a now-famous
Soviet foreign-intelligence capability known as "The Trust." The "Trust"
was a network of financial interests closely associated with the Communist
International's apparatus outside Russia. The core of the "Trust" was a
continuation of the funding-apparatus created to finance the radical rev
olution in Russia, a funding-apparatus centered around Odessa-born super
spy, Alexander Helphand ("Parvus"). With the establishment of the
Soviet "New Economic Policy" of the 1920s, this "Trust" organization
was expanded, to include Western financial concessionaires, such as
Averell Harriman. This expanded "Trust" was named by top Soviet spy
Felix Dzerzhinskii, as "Trust B." Armand Hammer's family were charter
members of the "Trust"; Hammer, today, is the top Soviet agent floating
around the world.
The "Trust" has a somewhat complicated history. When the foreign
financier interests of the "Trust" attempted to take over the internal
affairs of Soviet Russia, Stalin purged L. D. Trotsky's "Left Opposition,"
first, and, once rid of Trotsky, purged the "Right Opposition" faction of
"Trust" agent N. Bukharin. The Moscow Trials, and associated bloody
of the 1930s, were Stalin's effort to destroy the "Trust" organization
inside Russia, root and branch. After Stalin's death, his successors quickly
reestablished the old Communist International intelligence organization
as an integral part of Soviet intelligence, reconciled with the foreign
elements of the "Trust," and increased the role of the "Trust" in Soviet
foreign operations rapidly, beginning approximately 1956. The late Yuri
Andropov was a leading member of the Kuusinen-Varga Communist
International faction, which was behind these post-Stalin developments.
Andropov's rise to chief of the Soviet KGB, during the late 1960s, was
a beginning of consolidation of the power of the "Trust" in Russia. The
presently ruling dynasty in Moscow, centered around Marshal Nikolai
Ogarkov and party general-secretary Mikhail Gorbachov, is the "An
dropov dynasty," brought to power over the entire apparatus of the Soviet
state by decisions reached in Moscow during the spring and summer of
1982.
Leon Trotsky
This complicated history, in brief, is the significance of Armand Ham
mer, and this is the significance of the complex of wealthy financial
figures working closely with Hammer in pushing Soviet interests and
Soviet policy in the West. Some of these Soviet fellow-travelling, wealthy
financiers, may be Soviet agents pure and simple; whether they are, or
not, is important information, but is not the point we are stressing here.
Whether or not, some of them happen to be Soviet agents pure and
simple, all of them are agents of the "Trust" organization.
The chief failure of the Soviet counterintelligence functions of the
United States' government, has been the failure of the CIA and other
agencies to grasp the significance of the "Trust." The false assumption
is made, that Soviet agents are what popular opinion defines as "Marxists."
"Marxism" was, essentially, the quasi-rationalist variety of Giuseppe
Mazzini's "Young Europe" neo-Jacobinism. The International Working
men's Association, the so-called "Fi Socialist International," was per
sonally created by Mazzini, during a visit to London. During that visit,
Mazzini invited Karl Marx to the founding meeting, sponsoring Marx's
initial leading role in that institution. (Later, Mazzini's organization
sponsored N. Bakunin as its tool, in the effort to destroy Marx's influence,
and the "First International" itself.) Marxism was later revived, during
the 1890s, in parallel to the launching of 20th-century fascism, and was
spread into the United States beginning that decade.
Many among the "cosmopolitan" Bolsheviks and "left-wing Social
Democrats" were educated as Marxists, and were more or less Marxists
inside the initial apparatus of the Soviet leadership. The Communist
International organization's branches in Western Europe and the Amer
icas, was dominated by professed Marxists, although in Asia this was
never strictly the case. With the Soviet purge-trials of the 1930s, the
Marxist shell began to be dropped from the Soviet dictatorship itself, as
Stalin revived the "Third Rome" doctrine of Czar Ivan the Terrible,
while reconciling the Soviet state and Soviet state church. By the mid
1960s, Marxism began to be discarded entirely as the basis for Soviet
international operations; old Communists recruited to the Marxian ide
ology, were retained as Soviet assets, but narco-terrorist and kindred
forms of insurgency became the mainstream of Soviet foreign operations.
Today, the Soviet ideology is no longer "Marxist," but is more a
Dostoevskii variety of Nietzscheanism, based on the mystical Russian
imperialism of the "Third Rome" ideology. Today, the ideological center
for the Soviet imperial threat against Western civilization, is the Russian
Orthodox Church. U.S. counterintelligence has been on the trail of
almost extinct "Marxist" rabbits, while letting through bushels of Dos
toevskian snakes. In the worst cases, the Gnostic "blood and soil" ideo
logies of the Russian Orthodox state church, and Dostoevskii, are foolishly
accepted as praiseworthy, "anti-Marxist" factors; these most dangerous
fanaticisms, rising now to their greatest power within Soviet culture, are
foolishly praised as the signs of a "crumbling Soviet empire."
Today's ruling dynasty in Moscow, the Andropov dynasty of Ogarkov,
Gorbachov, et al., is "neo-Stalinist" in the truest, most profound sense.
These are "Stalin's children," leaders whose childhood and early adult
careers were shaped by the Stalin dictatorship. Unlike the Bolshevik
"cosmopolitans" of yore-Trotsky, Bukharin, et al.-and like Stalin,
their world-outlook is a fanatical, mystical commitment to the "holy
blood and soil" of "Holy Mother Russia." They are the spiritual heirs of
Czars Ivan the Terrible, an Alexander I gone mad, and Nicholas I. They
are essentially children of the notoriously mad and bloody-handed ras
kolniki, who see the Soviet dictatorship as but a new, thoroughly byzan
tine, ruling dynasty of imperial Russia, a successor to the failed Romanov
dynasty.
They are unlike the Stalin of 1929-53, in only one important respect.
They have restored the Soviet partnership with the Western members
of the Trust, and with revived elements of the old Communist Inter
national apparatus. This is the key to that Soviet spy-ring, operating
under the Israeli flag in the United States today.
There is one important feature of the Trust, which must be emphasized,
to understand the mechanics of this particular Israeli spy-ring. Most of
the literature on the subject of the Trust, mistakenly, proposes that the
Trust was created after the 1917 Russian Revolution. It is true, that the
Trust as such was organized by Polish Bolsheviks, such as Felix Dzerzinskis.
working closely with Leon Trotsky, and with the assistance of British
spy Sidney Reilly and of the patron of today's Jon Speller, Commander
Sergius Riis. Up to that point, such reports are factually true, but pro
foundly misleading.
What is overlooked, is that every key Bolshevik figure involved in
establishing the Soviet Trust had been a pre-revolutionary associate of
that vast, immensely funded operation of Alexander Helphand's (Par
vus's), which had controlled Trotsky in the 1905 Russian revolution,
and had organized the 1917 revolution. The group of Polish Bolsheviks,
who administered the creation of the Soviet Trust from the beginning,
merely continued what they had done under Parvus. The entirety of the
Soviet branch of the Communist International apparatus, purged by
Stalin during the 1920s and 1930s, was led by figures who had once been
owned by Parvus, during the events leading into the October 1917 rev
olution.
The point to be grasped, is that all modern radicalism in Europe (and
the Americas), has been established under the sponsorship of wealthy
financier family-interests. The Jacobins under Robespierre, Danton, and
Marat, were created and backed by powerful Swiss banking families from
Geneva and Lausanne, with support from the British East India Com
pany's Shelbourne, Pitt, and Bentham, in London. The French utopian
socialists of the early 19th century, were funded and steered by the same
banking circles. Mazzini's "Young Europe" organization, was safe-housed
in Switzerland, and steered by a consortium of powerful financial families.
The exiled Bolshevik leaders, like the Nazis and other fascists, were each
individually and collectively backed by elements of the same collection
of wealthy families.
The Jewish component of the funding of the Russian Mensheviks and
Bolsheviks, is only an aspect of the operations centered in Parvus's net
works, but is the crucial component to be understood for appreciation
of the way in which the Soviets are running a spy-ring under the Israeli
flag in the Americas, and how the Soviets have moved in to take over
Sharon and his faction inside Israel.
There are two areas of the pre-1917 map of Eastern Europe, on which
to concentrate attention, to understand the Jewish-financier component
of the Soviet Trust organization. The most important is the city of Odessa,
and nearby Bessarabia. The second is the old Livonian city of Vilna,
dominated by Jewish light-industry manufacturers; it was the Vilna-based
apparatus which had been the network smuggling funds to Plekhanov's
circles in Switzerland, and smuggled Russian Marxist literature into Rus
sia. Both Sidney Reilly and Parvus originated from Odessa, and Trotsky's
earliest political career was centered there. Many of the Jewish gangster
families of Canada and the United States, were immigrants from this
region of Russia and Romania.
This is not to cast suspicion upon Polish Jews, by any means. The
Yiddish renaissance was one of the noblest features of the 19th-century
history of Poland and modern Judaism. The famous stories of Sholom
Aleichem, and other writers of this tradition, should be read for manyEIR Special Repo
reasons, but among those reasons, is a first-hand insight into the way
representatives of this Yiddish-literature renaissance understood the dan
gerous character of a fanatical minority within Eastern European Jewry,
the minority which produced the Odessa complex and "Vladimir Hitler"
Jabotinsky's crew. After all, every other ethnic grouping has produced
its ration of criminals; what sort of racism is it, which denies Jews the
same curious privilege?
With the establishment of the Soviet Trust, the new Soviet state
transformed its relationship to the Bolsheviks' former financial backers,
from one of dependency, to one of partnership. This partnership was not
homogeneous; it had many similarities to any sort of large-scale joint
stock company. Various groups of partners shared common, but also
conflicting interests with one another, as Stalin's bloody purges under
score the fact.
The Western partners, apart from sundry quarrels among themselves,
had principally two interests. The narrow, immediate interest, was profit
from Soviet economic concessions; during the 1920s, under the Soviet
New Economic Policy, these profits on such Soviet primary-commodity
exports as grains and metals were enormous. The longer-term interest,
was to use the Soviet state and the Communist International as a factor
of destabilization in the Western partners' continuing efforts to destroy
the model of the United States' political-economy, and to return the
planet to a feudalistic sort of "global society." Stalin, alarmed at the
effects of the foreign concessionaires' looting of Russia under Bukharin's
administration, was unwilling to see Soviet Russia as merely a cat's-paw
for the "permanent revolution" projects of foreign financier interests;
hence the purges of Trotsky, Bukharin, and so forth. Stalin was willing
to cooperate with Western Trust partners, as he did at the Teheran and
Yalta conferences during World War II, but only on condition that the
Russian empire was enlarged, and that Russia did not trade away the
opportunity to realize Moscow's mystic destiny as capital of a worldwide
empire.
Once Russia had both fission and fusion arsenals, and, by 1956, had
established unchallenged control over the new colonies in Eastern Europe,
Russia was prepared to restore the partnership with the Western factions
of the Trust, and Western-based elements of the old Communist Inter
national apparatus. This willingness was based on conditions, that Russia's
increased power were recognized, and that the Western partners accepted
the perspective of a "New Yalta" agreement, under which most of Asia
and much of Europe would fall, sooner or later, into the Soviet sphere
of strategic influence.
Such agreements were reached between Moscow and leading elements
of the Anglo-American Liberal Establishments, beginning 1950, agree
ments which have been implemented, step by step, as policies of the
United States and its allies, since 1963, and, most emphatically, since
Henry A. Kissinger entered the National Security Council, in 1969. It
is Western members of the Trust-partnership within the Anglo-American
Liberal Establishments, which have steered the opinion of the Liberal
controlled news-media and the foreign-policy establishment, into their
present, Soviet fellow-traveller postures.
In the English-speaking world, it is the British, Canadian, and U.S.A.
variety of wealthy Soviet fellow-travellers, such as Averell and Pamela
Harriman, McGeorge Bundy, Henry A. Kissinger, David Rockefeller,
and so forth, which are most noticeable. The center of the Western
Trust, like Parvus's operations earlier, is Switzerland and Venice-Trieste.
End of part One. TBC
Share this post